Criminal Defence
At Lloyds PR Solicitors we represent request persons from EU countries and other jurisdictions.
At Lloyds PR Solicitors we represent request persons from EU countries and other jurisdictions. We have acted in many leading cases and successfully resisted extradition.Extradition is the practice by which an individual is made the subject of a warrant from a requesting country. A requesting country often seeks the return of an individual to face trial or serve a sentence.
We understand that these cases are never straightforward or clear cut. Many people flee countries whose judicial system lacks the appropriate structure for human rights to be respected an upheld. We firmly believe that no individual should be sent to a country to serve a sentence or face trial if their human rights are at serious risk of being breached.
If you or your family are the subject of an extradition warrant it is very important that you seek advice and representation as soon as possible. We regularly represent clients at first appearances where we successfully secure bail and have even pursued cases to the Supreme Court in order to ensure that individuals are not extradited.
At Lloyds PR Solicitors we represent request persons from EU countries and other jurisdictions. We have acted in many leading cases and successfully resisted extradition.
Extradition is the practice by which an individual is made the subject of a warrant from a requesting country. A requesting country often seeks the return of an individual to face trial or serve a sentence.
We understand that these cases are never straightforward or clear cut. Many people flee countries whose judicial system lacks the appropriate structure for human rights to be respected an upheld. We firmly believe that no individual should be sent to a country to serve a sentence or face trial if their human rights are at serious risk of being breached.
If you or your family are the subject of an extradition warrant it is very important that you seek advice and representation as soon as possible. We regularly represent clients at first appearances where we successfully secure bail and have even pursued cases to the Supreme Court in order to ensure that individuals are not extradited.
Appeal at the ECtHR of an extradition order by the UK for a vulnerable individual to be extradited to Lithuania to face regulatory charges.
Leading extradition case in relation to section 12A of the Extradition Act 2003 (“Absence of prosecution decision”). The warrant against the client was successfully discharged on grounds of section 12A, as well as Article 8 (right to family and private life).
Leading case with respect to Italian prison assurances. Client was requested by Italy following a conviction and sentence for rape.
​Court was persuaded to withdraw the European Arrest Warrant issued in connection with human trafficking allegations due to the client’s serious illness.
Successfully appealed a Part 2 conviction extradition warrant from India where our client was wanted to finish serving his 10-year sentence for supplying class A drugs.
A European Arrest Warrant was issued pursuant to a convictions of robbery and driving offences. It was successfully discharged on Article 8 grounds (right to family and private life).
A European Arrest Warrant issued by Lithuania was contested at the magistrates’ court and then later appealed to the High Court.
This was a Part 2 arrest warrant. Extradition was successfully resisted on the basis that Moldova applied for an incorrect arrest warrant and the fraud offence alleged was not a criminal offence under the English law due to the pre-requisite mens rea element not being part of the offence under the Moldovan law.
Lloyds PR Solicitors act in B v Italy [2024] UKSC 9, where the Supreme Court allowed our appeal, concluding that the lower courts were wrong to find that the appellant had deliberately absented himself from his trial in Italy. The Supreme Court held that for a person to deliberately absent himself from his trial, he must unequivocally waive, in a knowing and intelligent way, his right to attend trial. In so doing, the Supreme Court overturned the principle that had developed in English caselaw since 2016 that a person will be deliberately absent where he demonstrates a “manifest lack of diligence” which results in his ignorance of the trial.
Successfully discharged an accusation European Arrest Warrant on appeal arguing particularity grounds. The case concerned an allegation of a large multinational fraud conspiracy where the client was said to be the leader of the criminal organisation.